About the Author Rose Nanashima is a pseudonym. Learn more at http: Knights Hill Publishing June 17, Language: Print edition purchase must be sold by Amazon.
Vampire Democracy [Rose Nanashima, Felix R Savage] on emi-takahashi.com *FREE * shipping on qualifying offers. Amid scientific and legal controversy, Clare. Editorial Reviews. About the Author. Rose Nanashima is a pseudonym. Learn more at Vampire Democracy - Kindle edition by Rose Nanashima. Download it .
Thousands of books are eligible, including current and former best sellers. Look for the Kindle MatchBook icon on print and Kindle book detail pages of qualifying books. Print edition must be purchased new and sold by Amazon. Gifting of the Kindle edition at the Kindle MatchBook price is not available. Learn more about Kindle MatchBook.
Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video. Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features: Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later. I received a complementary copy in order to give a honest review. The Story of "Vampire Democracy" starts really slow, actually it didn't really catch my interest at all. First when Clare, the protagonist, comes to Japan, things get a little more interesting.
She's researching on vampires and writing a scientific study about the subject. Working in social studies myself I find her way of working very doubtful.
She's not really trying to gather information and after two days in Tokyo, she works in a vampire night club, for science's sake, but her research doesn't get anywhere the whole time. She's being dragged into all sorts of conflicts, intrigues and other quarrels in the vampire underground of Tokyo and the reader keeps asking: Clare really seems to be alien to the concept of thinking, she just lets everyone else drag her into problems. Also, the love story and Clare's sudden magical ability is absolutely redundant. Now, here it is …. Some of these working class types are not terribly well brought up, and can be very rude at times.
The VC, as dupe-servants of the ruling class, does the opposite: What holds them together is not solidarity, but mutual fear — the fear that they will be the next one to be outed, exposed, condemned. There must be no lightness, and certainly no humour.
Thought is hard work, for people with posh voices and furrowed brows. Where there is confidence, introduce scepticism. The more guilt the better. People must feel bad: You do some good works for the poor, too, right? While fluidity of identity, pluraity and multiplicity are always claimed on behalf of the VC members — partly to cover up their own invariably wealthy, privileged or bourgeois-assimilationist background — the enemy is always to be essentialized.
Their whole identity becomes defined by one ill-judged remark or behavioural slip. The second libidinal formation is neo-anarchism. By neo-anarchists I definitely do not mean anarchists or syndicalists involved in actual workplace organisation, such as the Solidarity Federation. I mean, rather, those who identify as anarchists but whose involvement in politics extends little beyond student protests and occupations, and commenting on Twitter.
They are also overwhelmingly young: Neo-anarchists have experienced nothing but capitalist realism. By the time the neo-anarchists had come to political consciousness — and many of them have come to political consciousness remarkably recently, given the level of bullish swagger they sometimes display — the Labour Party had become a Blairite shell, implementing neo-liberalism with a small dose of social justice on the side.
But the problem with neo-anarchism is that it unthinkingly reflects this historical moment rather than offering any escape from it. Why have these two configurations come to the fore? The first reason is that they have been allowed to prosper by capital because they serve its interests. The second reason is what Jodi Dean has called communicative capitalism.
So what can we do now? First of all, it is imperative to reject identitarianism, and to recognise that there are no identities, only desires, interests and identifications. Instead of freezing people into chains of already-existing equivalences, the point was to treat any articulation as provisional and plastic. New articulations can always be created. No-one is essentially anything.
Sadly, the right act on this insight more effectively than the left does. But that, after all, is not the point.
But the rejection of identitarianism can only be achieved by the re-assertion of class. A left that does not have class at its core can only be a liberal pressure group. Apparently, however, this vampire is a nice vampire. Before she fangs her victim, she bats her eyes, and begs permission to do a taste test, or is that a blood test? For more on her garlic practices see http: Sink your teeth into this: It appears modern politicians think so? Americans as well as Europeans have bought into the ridiculous idea that all religions are good; that all religions worship the same God or gods; that all religions have value and deserve equal protection under the constitution.
As it stands now, modern politicians think that Islam, Vampirism, and the First Church of Cannibas deserve the same legal protection as Christianity despite the difference in the character of these faiths. Democrats especially, are pounding the drums for equal treatment of all religions.
And, are quite willing, if it comes to this, that when a Muslim majority grabs hold of power in Congress to draft an Amendment to convert the nation to Islam and do away with the constitution as long such an action follows a democratic process. And this is what Muslims will do if they become a majority as a French Muslim cleric stated in a recent sermon,.